embed embed share link link
Embed This Video close
Share This Video close
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark
Rate This Video embed
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
Tags For This Video tags
rate rate tags tags lights lights

2017 Undergraduate Research Symposium-Drew McLaughlin

SESSION 2F
Panel Title: “Humanities Undergraduate Research Fellowship: Truth, Experimentation, and Spectacle: An Interdisciplinary Approach” – Gumwood Room: Session 2f Thursday, May 18, 2017
MODERATOR: Paul Peppis

Drew McLaughlin “The Role of the Listener in Nonnative Speech Perception Researc”h
Abstract
Both environmental noise (e.g., talkers in the background) and talker-related variation (e.g., accented speech) can create adverse listening conditions for speech communication. Individuals recruit additional cognitive, linguistic, or perceptual resources when faced with such challenges, and they vary in their ability to understand degraded speech. However, it is unclear whether listeners employ the same additional resources when encountering different types of challenging listening conditions. In the present study, we compare individuals’ ability on a variety of cognitive-linguistic skills—including vocabulary, selective attention, rhythm perception, and working memory—with transcription accuracy (i.e., intelligibility scores) of speech degraded by the addition of speech-shaped noise or multi-talker babble and/or talker variation. Initial analyses show that intelligibility scores across degradations of the same class (i.e., either environmental or talker-related) significantly correlate, but correlations of intelligibility scores across degradation classes are weaker. The relationship between intelligibility scores and cognitive-linguistic skills is similar, showing that while vocabulary and working memory correlate with multiple degradation types, rhythm perception only correlates with environmental degradations. Taken together, these results indicate that listeners may recruit different resources when faced with different classes of listening challenges.

>